Municipal budget in general educational institution
average secondary school № 84
named after Hero of Russia Dmitry Petrov
Pervomaisky district of Rostov-on-Don
REFERENCE
June 30, 2014
Analysis of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language in grades 11 “A” and 11 “B” (2014)
Features of control and certification of graduates during the Unified State Examination (USE) in the Russian language are determined by the specifics of the subject, the final goals of training and the purpose of the examination work.
Modern stage The development of methods of teaching the Russian language is characterized by new approaches to defining learning goals. The goals of training, its content (knowledge, abilities and skills) are determined through the concepts of linguistic, linguistic and communicative competencies.
The examination paper is designed in such a way that it allows you to check the extent to which high school graduates have developed each of the three competencies - language, linguistic and communicative.
In 2014, 15 graduates of class 11 “A” and 19 graduates of class 11 “B” took the Unified State Examination in Russian – a total of 34 students. All participants successfully completed the examination tests. The examination work in the Russian language for school graduates of the 11th grade has its purpose - to evaluate the preparation of secondary school graduates in the Russian language for the purpose of their final certification and the selection of applicants for admission to colleges and universities.
Completing the examination required the following skills from graduates:
Conduct various types analysis of linguistic units. Analyze, classify linguistic facts in order to provide various types of speech activity.
Exercise speech self-control. Evaluate written statements from the point of view of linguistic design and the effectiveness of achieving the set communicative tasks.
Distinguish between variants of norms. Analyze linguistic units from the point of view of correctness, accuracy and appropriateness of their use.
Conduct linguistic analysis of educational, scientific, business, journalistic, colloquial and artistic texts. Use basic techniques for information processing of text.
Extract necessary information from various sources, create your own speech statements in accordance with the assigned tasks.
Master the basic techniques of information processing of text.
The dual function of the Unified State Examination - to certify graduates of secondary schools and select among them the most prepared students to continue their studies at a university - determines the structure and content of the examination work. In it, in addition to basic level tasks, there are advanced and high level complexities with great differentiating power. It is these tasks that make it possible to identify the most prepared students from among the students being examined.
Three types of tasks were used in the work: tasks with a choice of answers, tasks with a short answer, tasks with a detailed answer.
Most multiple-choice tasks check linguistic competence of examinees: the ability to identify compliance (or non-compliance) of any speech unit with a language norm. Several multiple choice questions are checked linguisticscultural competence - the ability to recognize linguistic units and classify them - and communicative competence - the ability to understand a statement, coherently, and logically construct a text. In general, multiple-choice tasks test Russian language skills at a basic level.
Main general results of the Russian language exam
In 2014, the average test score in the Russian language: in 11A - 61 points, in 11B - 54 points. The average test score for the school is 57 points (last school year 63.2), which lower than this year’s indicators for the Pervomaisky district, the city, the Rostov region and Russia as a whole, as well as in comparison with previous years.
The results of graduates of the Unified State Examination school in the Russian language can be divided into several groups:
Class
The quality of knowledge in 11A is higher than in 11B. The average result is 50%, which, even taking into account the reduced passing score, is not a high achievement.
Results of completing tasks of a basic level of complexity (Part A)
The work consists of 39 tasks: tasks of a basic level of complexity - 24, advanced - 7, high - 8.Tasks with a choice of answers (type A) - 30, with a short answer (type B) - 8, with a detailed answer (type C) - 1.
For the certification of school graduates, what is important, first of all, is the results of completing the tasks of the first part (A), which tests the development of skills that ensure proficiency in oral and written language at a basic level. The table shows the results of completing all tasks in the first part of the examination:
The percentage of assignments completed by topic can be presented as follows.
Difficulty level of the task: B - basic, P - advanced, V - high.
Analyzing the table data, we can conclude that graduates have well mastered the following topics:
1. Morphological norms (88%).
2. Syntactic norms (85%).
3. Text. Semantic and compositional integrity of the text. Sequence of sentences in the text (88%).
4. Means of connecting sentences in the text (85%).
5. Punctuation marks in sentences with dissociated members (82%).
6. Information processing of written texts various styles and genres (85%).
7. Text as a speech work. Semantic and compositional integrity of the text (94%).
It is noteworthy that the students completed the tasks higher level difficulty is better than with basic level tasks (53% - 94%).
Graduates showed low results when performing the following tasks:
1. Offer. Types of sentences according to the number of grammatical bases. Types of complex sentences by means of connecting parts. Complex sentences with different types communications (44%).
2.Parts of speech (38).
3. Punctuation marks in a simple complicated sentence with homogeneous members (44%).
Of the 15 graduates of 11A and 19 graduates of 11B classes, no one coped with the tasks of part A 100%, which indicates the fragility of the students’ knowledge. The maximum number of correct answers in part A (29) was given by M. Niskubina (grade 11A). Minimum quantity(7 points) from Varosyan S. (grade 11B). Only three tasks (A4, A7, A28) were completed by students 100%. The students showed the lowest result (38%) in part A11 (parts of speech). This is a serious gap in the knowledge of graduates, because... Lack of understanding of the parts of speech entails errors in the spelling of words, punctuation and grammatical errors (errors in the practical application of knowledge).
Results of completing tasks of an increased level of complexity
(part B)
Quests open type short answer questions are aimed primarily at testing the linguistic competence of the examinees. In tasks of this type, more complex language material is offered for analysis than in tasks with a choice of answers, and it is presented not in the form of isolated linguistic examples (words, phrases, sentences), but based on text material.
In general, text tasks represent a multidimensional analysis of the text (semantic, compositional, typological, stylistic, linguistic) and are tasks of an increased level of complexity.
The second part of the work is focused both on the final certification of school graduates and the selection of applicants to continue their studies at the university. Traditionally, these tasks cause the greatest difficulties for graduates.
The level of development of a particular competency can be determined by the results of completing groups of tasks that test the relevant skills. It can be seen that the overall result of completing tasks of an increased level of complexity is low. The data is presented in the table below.
Content elements and activities tested
B8 0 b
Graduates showed extremely low results when completing the following tasks:
B2. Parts of speech (29%);
Q4. Offer. The grammatical (predicative) basis of a sentence. Types of proposals based on the presence of main members: two-part and one-part (38%);
B6. Complex sentence (32%).
All of these topics are closely related to each other. Gaps in morphology cause gaps in syntax, and then in punctuation.
Task B8 (analysis means of expressiveness of the text) involves scoring from 0 to 4 points. The score depends on the number of correct answers. Each correct answer is worth 1 point.
27 students (55%) earned 4 points.
3 points – 7 students (14%).
2 points –5 student (10%).
1 point – 5 students (10%).
0 points – 5 students (10%).
The fact that 10% of graduates failed to complete task B8 indicates their lack of knowledge, skills and abilities to identify artistic means of expression. This means that in their practice of verbal communication they also do not fully use the resources of the Russian language. Consequently, their speech is poor and monotonous. This suggests that graduates have difficulty expressing their thoughts, which will affect their future studies.
Results of completing tasks of a high level of complexity
(part C)
An open-type task with a detailed answer is an essay based on the proposed text. The task checks the level of individual communication skills of the examinees:
analyze the content and problems of the text read;
Analysis of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2016.
A total of 12 students took part in the Unified State Examination 2016 in the Russian language.
Academic success – 100%
The average score for the school was 80.33%;
The target was not lower than 69.42%, and was exceeded by 10.91%.
Number of students who received the highest scores:
maximum 100 points – 1 (Adeliya Fazlieva), which amounted to 8.33% of the total number of those who passed;
high-scoring (90 and above) – 1 (Ivanova Tatyana);
(more than 80) – 4 (Angelina Solovyova, Alexander Shilov, Sergey Petrov, Nadezhda Lyaplina).
The lowest score is 67 for Evgeniya Kuchinskaya.
Teacher: Pavlova G. L.
Part Execution Analysis
received points 2 points-12 academic.100 %
Syntactic norms (use of conjunction)
Lexical norms (the use of a word in accordance with the exact lexical meaning and the requirement of lexical compatibility)
Orthoepic norms (stress placement)
3 lessons
25 %
Morphological norms (formation of word forms). Paronyms.
2 lessons
16, 67 %
Spelling standards
Syntactic norms. Approval standards. Management standards. Constructing sentences with homogeneous members. Construction complex sentences
Received points 5b-9 academic.
4b-3 school
75 %
25 %
Find the vowel being tested
3 lessons
25 %
Spelling of prefixes
Choose a word without a mistake
1 lesson
8,33 %
Verb conjugation
3 lessons
25 %
Merged spelling of a word with no
Continuous writing of conjunctions
2 lessons
16, 67 %
Spelling -n- and –nn-
2 studies
16, 67 %
Place one comma in simple sentences with homogeneous members or in complex sentences
Got points
1b.-0
2b. -12 school
100 %
Punctuation marks in sentences with isolated members (definitions, circumstances, applications)
6 lessons
50 %
Punctuation in complex sentences and simple sentence with homogeneous members
1 lesson
8,33 %
Punctuation marks in sentences with words and constructions that are grammatically unrelated to the members of the sentence
Punctuation marks in a non-union complex sentence
Text as a speech work. Semantic and compositional integrity of the text
4 lessons
33,33 %
Information processing of written texts of various styles and genres
7 lessons
58,33 %
Lexical meaning of the word. Dividing the vocabulary of the Russian language into groups depending on the semantic connections between words
Means of connecting sentences in the text
2 lessons
16,67 %
Speech. Language means of expression
1b. - 2 hours
2 b. - 1 hour
3 b. – 3 lessons
4 b. – 6 lessons
16,67 %
8,33 %
25 %
50 %
More detailed information about completing tasks 1,7,15,24
Task 1 on text knowledge, maximum score – 2, was completed by all students, 100% completion.
Task 7 on grammatical errors. Maximum score– 9 students received 5 points, which is 75%, 4 points – 3 students (25%), none received 0.1 or 2 points, which indicates a high level of knowledge of the syntactic norm.
Task 15 was also completed by all students with a maximum score of 2 points, 100% knowledge of placing punctuation marks in a simple sentence with homogeneous members and a complex sentence.
Maximum assignment score 24 – 4 points
As we can see, out of 12 students who made mistakes while completing the task, they did not receive 0 points. The overwhelming majority of those who took the test completed the task with 3 - 4 points, but there were also 1 and 2 points, although the children performed this task better during the trial exam papers.
The falling topics were tasks 16 and 21.
Task 16 tests knowledge on the topic “Punctuation marks in sentences with isolated members: definitions, circumstances, applications.” 6 students failed this task, which is 50% of those who completed it.
Task 21 is aimed at information processing of written texts of various styles and genres; 7 students failed this task, which is 58.33%.
Analysis of the implementation of part 2
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave at least 2 examples from the text read that are important for understanding the problem.3 b.
41,67 %
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave 1 example from the text read, important for understanding the problem.
Factual errors related to understanding the problem source text, no comments
2 b.
50 %
The text problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text,But
the examinee did not give a single example from the read text that was important for understanding the problem,
or
There was 1 factual error in the commentary related to understanding the source text
1 b.
8,33 %
The problem formulated by the examinee was not commented on,
or commented without reference to the source text,
or there were more than 1 factual errors in the comments related to understanding the source text,
or another problem not formulated by the examinee was commented on,
or a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as comments,
or in A large fragment is quoted as comments
0 b.
K3
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text
1 b.
100%
or
0 b.
K4
Argumentation by the examinee of his own opinion on the problem
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from artistic, journalistic or scientific
literature )
3 b.
66,67 %
at least 2 arguments based on knowledge and life experience),
or
provided only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature
2 b.
25 %
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave1 argument), based on knowledge, life experience
1 b.
8,33 %
The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author),but didn't give any arguments ,
or the examinee’s opinion is stated only formally (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”),
or the examinee's opinion is not reflected in the work at all
0 b.
K5
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of presentation:
– there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken;
– there are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work
2 b.
91,67 %
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation,
But 1 logical error was made,
and/or there is 1 violation of paragraph division of the text in the work
1 b.
8,33 %
The examinee’s work reveals a communicative intent,But
more than 1 logical error was made,
and/or there are 2 cases of violation of paragraph division of the text
0 b.
K6
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts and the variety of grammatical structure of speech.
*The examinee receives the highest score for this criterion only if the highest score is obtained for the K10 criterion
2 b.
33,33%
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts,But
the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech can be traced,
or
the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech,But there are violations of the accuracy of expression of thoughts
1 b.
58,33 %
The work of the examinee is characterized by a poor vocabulary and monotony of grammatical structure of speech
0 b.
8,33%
K7
Compliance with spelling standards
no spelling errors (or 1 minor error)
3 b.
66,67 %
no more than 2 mistakes were made
2 b.
25 %
3–4 mistakes were made
1 b.
8.33%
more than 4 mistakes were made
0 b.
K8
Compliance with punctuation standards
no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error)
3 b.
33,33%
1–3 mistakes were made
2 b.
58,33 %
4–5 mistakes were made
1 b.
8,33 %
more than 5 mistakes were made
0 b.
K9
Compliance with language norms
no grammatical errors
2 b.
50 %
1–2 mistakes were made
1 b.
50 %
more than 2 mistakes were made
0 b.
K10
Compliance with speech norms
no more than 1 speech error was made
2 b.
41,67 %
2–3 mistakes were made
1 b.
41,67 %
more than 3 mistakes were made
0 b.
16,67 %
K11
Compliance with ethical standards
there are no ethical errors in the work
1 b.
100%
ethical mistakes were made (1 or more)
0 b.
K12
Maintain factual accuracy in background material
there are no factual errors in the background material
1 b.
91. 67%
there were factual errors (1 or more) in the background material
0 b.
8.33 %
Analysis of the fulfillment of the content of the essay (criteria 1 – 4) indicates that the majority of students adequately perceive the text they read, are able to identify and formulate its problem, and identify the author’s position.
Most examinees do not have any difficulty commenting on the problem of the source text: 5 students were able to comment on 3 maximum points, 6 received 2 points, 1 student - 1 point out of 3 possible, 0 points - 0.
The students had some difficulty arguing their own opinion: 8 students were able to get a maximum of 3 points, 3 students - 2 points each, 1 student - 1 point, gave one argument.
When writing an essay, students demonstrated a fairly high level of spelling literacy: 3 points - 8 students, 2 points - 3 students, that is, 11 students received 2-3 points according to this criterion - 91.67%. The same percentage was obtained according to criterion K 8 for punctuation skills: those who made more than five mistakes - 0; 3 points were received by 4 students, 2 points by 7 students, 1 point by 1 student. They performed very well on the K9 criterion for grammatical errors: 6 students received the maximum 2 points and another 6 students received 1 point. There are 0 points for factual error for 1 student and for accuracy and expressiveness of speech.
You should pay attention to K10 speech skills: 5 students received the maximum 2 points, another 5 received 1 point and 0 points - 2 students.
The average score for completing the essay is 19.58 points out of a maximum possible 24 points. Of the 12 students, 2 received the highest score in the essay (maximum 24 points Adeliya Fazlieva, 23 points Tatyana Ivanova); 22 points – 2 students, 21 points – 1 student, 20 points – 1 student, 18 points – 2 students; 17 points – 3 academic points, 16 points. –1 school
It can be assumed that some miscalculations in teaching the Russian language are associated with ignoring the key role of systematic work on development and improvementall types of speech activityin their interrelation throughout all years of teaching the Russian language. The activity approach should become the leading one in the lesson. At the same time, in the process of teaching the Russian language, it is necessary to purposefully develop the dialogical and monological speech of students (oral and written); develop the ability to reason on the proposed topic, bringing various ways reasoning one’s own thoughts, the ability to draw conclusions; learn to conduct any dialogue ethically correctly. With this approach, the focus is on the interests and creative potential of the student, his personal and reading experience, which meets the requirements of implementationpersonally oriented approach in teaching the Russian language.
You should pay attention to common topics when preparing for exams, speech errors, expressive means of language, information processing of text, and types of text.
Certificate on the results of the trial school Unified State Examination in the Russian language in 11th grade.
Target: work out the procedure for organizing and conducting the Unified State Exam; check the level of students' mastery of the material for the high school course.
Date: 19.03.2014
Organizer trial Unified State Exam: ZD for water management Oorzhak A.M.
On March 19, 2014, a trial Unified State Exam was conducted on the basis of the MBOU secondary school in the village of Don-Terezin. The tasks were taken demo options KIMov 2013 and 2014. There are 7 in total in class, there were no absentees at the time of taking the exam.
When conducting the trial Unified State Exam, all participants were strictly guided by the instructions for conducting the Unified State Exam, and the entire procedure for its conduct was observed.
The results are as follows:
Part A assignment
Full name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Aziyana | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Ai-Mergen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Aislana | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Dolaan | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Monge | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Torepchi | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sambuulai Maryana | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total: |
Individual results in points
student's FI | True(points) | False (points) |
|
Oorzhak Aziyana | |||
Oorzhak Ai-Mergen | |||
Oorzhak Aislana | |||
Oorzhak Dolaan | |||
Oorzhak Monge | |||
Oorzhak Torepchi | |||
Sambuulai Maryana |
Part B assignment
F.I. studying | Right | Not true |
|||||||||
Oorzhak Aziyana | +++- | ||||||||||
Oorzhak Ai-Mergen | ---- | ||||||||||
Oorzhak Aislana | ++++ | ||||||||||
Oorzhak Dolaan | ---- | ||||||||||
Oorzhak Monge | ---- | ||||||||||
Oorzhak Torepchi | ---- | ||||||||||
Sambuulai Maryana | ++++ |
Task B was completed:
B1- 7
B2-7
B3-7
B4-6
B5-2
B6 – 0;
B7 – 4
B8 –3 (partially)
Part C task
F.I. studying | K10 | K11 | K12 | Total points | Notes |
||||||||||
Oorzhak Aziyana | The volume is small. |
||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Ai-Mergen | Job not done |
||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Aislana | 15 b. | ||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Dolaan | Task not completed |
||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Monge | Task not completed |
||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Torepchi | Task not completed |
||||||||||||||
Sambuulai Maryana | |||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Aislana | |||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Dolaan | |||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Monge | |||||||||||||||
Oorzhak Torepchi | |||||||||||||||
Sambuulai Maryana | |||||||||||||||
% quality of knowledge/% performance | 43%/100% |
Conclusions:
- Compared to previous works, there is a positive trend in the Unified State Examination results. Students who did not pass the minimum threshold were able to complete the KIM tasks. Consequently, the % indicator of quality of education and academic performance has increased.
- The boys continue to struggle with Part C, which involves writing an argumentative essay.
- Graduates developed skills in filling out registration forms and answer forms.
1. Based on the results of trial testing in the Russian language, the subject teacher should pay attention to the repetition of questions that caused difficulty for students when completing Part A:
Participial phrase (A4,B5);
Syntactic norms (A5);
Spelling (A17);
Spelling NOT and NI (A18);
Spelling of auxiliary parts of speech (A 19);
Punctuation in a complex sentence (A 26, B 6);
Functional-semantic types of speech (A 29);
Vocabulary (A 30);
Means of expression (B8).
In Part C, develop skills in working with text. There are students who have not started completing the task at all (Oorzhak Ai-Mergen, Oorzhak Dolaan, Oorzhak Monge, Oorzhak Torepchi).
2. The results of the exam will be considered at a meeting of the School of Humanities for the Humanitarian Cycle.
The certificate was compiled by a teacher of Russian language and literature:__________/Mongush I.V./
Transcript
1 Analysis of the Unified State Examination results in Russian language and literature academic year, Sukhikh E.V., methodologist of the Odintsovo educational center “Development of Education” SUMMARY STATISTICAL DATA ON THE NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE USE IN EARLY AND MAIN STAGE SUBJECTS
2 RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Moscow region people. Odintsovo district 1552 people. (total) Odintsovo district 1508 people (current year graduates) Average score for the Moscow region 69.06 Average score for the Odintsovo district 68.56 1st place in the Moscow Region in the number of graduates who received 100 points (11 people) 2 people did not pass the threshold score . (current year graduates)
3 Average test score in MO (early and main stages) Indicator Russian language Moscow region Odintsovo municipal district Moscow region Odintsovo municipal district 65.68 65.22 69.06 67.06 65.8 68.56 Literature 65.83 57.35 59.93 67.35 56.95 59.48
4 Participants who did not confirm completion of the programs (graduates of the current year) Number of participants Number of those who did not confirm completion of the programs % of the number MO district MO district MO district Russian language Literature, 24 0.38 1.92
5 11 people scored 100 points in the region (graduates of the current year) Unified State Exam in Russian. (0.7%) Unified State Examination in Literature 1 person. (0.96%)
6 1 MBOU Odintsovo Secondary School 1 2 MBOU Odintsovo Secondary School 5 3 MAOU Odintsovo Lyceum 6 named after. A.S. Pushkin 4 MBOU Odintsovo Gymnasium 13 5 MBOU Barvikha Secondary School 6 MBOU Dubkovskaya Secondary School "Friendship" 7 Private institution of general education and additional education"Interbranch Technological Institute" "Boarding Lyceum "Podmoskovny" 8 Autonomous non-profit educational organization "Gymnasium of St. Basil the Great" 9 MBOU Odintsovo Lyceum 10
7 10 Gymnasium of the Autonomous Non-Profit educational organization higher education"Odintsovo Humanitarian University" 11 Autonomous non-profit organization General educational organization "SCHOOL "PRESIDENT" Institutions in which graduates scored 100 points
8 Characteristics of Unified State Exam tasks in the Russian language in 2015 In 2015, the following changes were made to the testing and measuring materials: - the number of CMM parts and the number of tasks changed; - the format of tasks has been changed; - the primary score for completing tasks has been changed; - when checking understanding of the lexical meaning of a word, KIM includes work with a dictionary entry.
9 Formulation of task A4 A6 A7 A9 A10 Indicate the grammatically correct continuation of the sentence. In which sentence can the subordinate part of the joint clause of the sentence be replaced by a separate definition expressed by a participial phrase? Which of the following should come first in this sentence? What combination of words is the grammatical basis of the sentence? Please indicate the correct characteristics of the proposal. A11 Indicate a sentence that contains a passive participle. A20 Explain the correct explanation for the use of a comma or its absence.
10 A24 How to explain the placement of the colon in this sentence. Characteristics of Unified State Examination tasks in the Russian language in 2015 The following tasks in Part 1 have been excluded:
11 Characteristics of Unified State Examination tasks in the Russian language in 2015 Formulation of task B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 Indicate the method of word formation. Write out the passive participle. Indicate the type of subordinating connection in the sentence. Among the proposals. find a simple one-part impersonal sentence. Among the sentences, find a sentence with a separate circumstance. Among the sentences...find a sentence that includes a subordinate clause of reason.
12 Changes in KIMakh Unified State Examination in 2015 Each version of the examination paper consists of 2 parts and includes 25 tasks that differ in form and level of difficulty. Part 1 -24 tasks with short answer; - the answer to the tasks of Part 1 is given by the corresponding entry in the form of a word, phrase, number or sequence of numbers written without spaces, commas and other additional characters. Part 2 1 open-type task with a detailed answer (essay), testing the ability to create your own statement based on the text read.
13 Distribution of tasks according to the main content sections of the academic subject “Russian Language” Content sections Number of tasks Number of tasks Vocabulary and phraseology 2 3.22 Spelling Punctuation Speech. Text 5 1,2,20,21,23 Speech. Language norms Expressiveness of Russian speech 1 24 Speech development. Essay 1 25
14 The level of development of a particular competence can be determined by the results of completing groups of tasks Competence Linguistic (knowledge of the language system, mastery of basic language concepts) Linguistic (knowledge of basic language norms) Numbers of tasks Average % of completion 2014 Average % of completion, 23.24 72.4 % 82.6% 4-19, K7, K8, K9, K10, K11, K12 (in part C) 68.3% 79.9%
15 Communicative (speech skills) 1-3,20,21,22 K1-K6 65.95% 85% Model of task 1 involves choosing from 5 options for such an answer, where the text is shortened while preserving the full amount of information, where the main information is expressed as much as possible at minimum cost speech means. Test takers find it difficult to identify sentences that convey in detail additional information that is secondary to understanding the main idea. Managed: MO 97.6
16 Odintsovo district 95.47% Task 2 It is necessary to insert the missing word, which must meet two criteria: not violate the main features of the text, and also emphasize the semantic relationships between sentences. Successful: Municipal District 92% Odintsovo District 92.96%
17 Task 3 This task appears in this form for the first time. Previously, students were asked to determine the meaning of a word from a specific sentence and were given 4 answer options. This year it was necessary to determine the meaning of a word based on a fragment of a dictionary entry. Successful: Moscow region - 87% Odintsovo district 85.15%
18 Task 4 When completing task 4, the ability to evaluate speech was tested from the point of view of compliance with the basic orthoepic norms of the Russian literary language. The success of completing the task depended on how well the examinee knows the basic norms of pronunciation of words and individual forms of words, as well as on knowledge of the most common words in the Russian language and the use of an orthoepic dictionary in preparation for the exam. Success: Moscow region - 74% Odintsovo district 72%
19 Task 5 In task 5 you need to find an incorrectly used highlighted word in the sentences and correct the lexical error by choosing a paronym for the highlighted word. Successful: Moscow Region 52% Odintsovo District 51.42%
20 Task 6 This task reflects mastery of morphological norms. The graduate must not only find an error in the formation of the word form, but also correct it by writing it correctly. Successful: Municipal District 81% Odintsovo District 78.95%
21 Task 7 The task determines the nature of a grammatical error in speech. Task 7 is a task of a high level of complexity, as it requires the ability to establish a correspondence between an error and a rule. Errors were most easily identified in the incorrect construction of sentences with adverbial and participial phrases, indirect speech, and inconsistent definitions. Successful: Municipal District 95% Odintsovo District 86.13%
22 Tasks Spelling standards Task 8. Spelling roots Achieved by: Moscow Region 85% Odintsovo district 83.27% Task 9. Spelling prefixes. Successful: Municipal District 88% Odintsovo District 87.31%
23 Task 10. Spelling suffixes. Achieved by: Moscow Region 93% Odintsovo District 92.47% Tasks Spelling standards Task 11. Spelling personal endings of verbs and suffixes of participles. Successful: Municipal District 66% Odintsovo District 64.6%
24 Task 12. Spelling NOT and NI. Achieved by: Moscow Region 68% Odintsovo District 68.36% Task Spelling standards Task 13. Integrated, separate, hyphenated spelling of words. Successful: Municipal District 77% Odintsovo District 77%
25 Task 14. Spelling N- and NN- in various parts of speech. Achieved by: Moscow Region 68% Odintsovo District 68.22% Tasks Punctuation norms Task 15. Punctuation marks in a simple complicated sentence (with homogeneous members). Successful: Moscow region 93.68% Odintsovo district 83.34%
26 Task 16. Punctuation marks in sentences with isolated members of the sentence (definitions, circumstances, applications). Achieved by: Moscow Region 78.01% Odintsovo District 74.84% Tasks Punctuation norms Task 17. Punctuation marks in sentences with words and constructions that are grammatically unrelated to the members of the sentence. Success: MO 67%
27 Odintsovo district 66.27% Task 18. Punctuation marks in a complex sentence. Achieved: Moscow Region 74.34% Odintsovo District 70.8% Assignments Punctuation norms.
28 Task 19. Punctuation marks in a complex sentence with a conjunction and a non-conjunction. Complex sentence with different types of connections. Achieved by: Moscow Region 56.35% Odintsovo District 58.81% Tasks Semantic and speech analysis of the text Task 20. Text as a speech work. Semantic and compositional integrity of the text. Ability to use basic reading skills. Success: MO 68.41%
29 Odintsovo district 67.31% Task 21. Functional and semantic types of speech. Ability to conduct various types of analysis of linguistic units, linguistic phenomena and facts. Achieved: Moscow Region 47.75% Odintsovo District 50.24% Assignments Semantic and speech analysis of the text. Task 22. Lexical meaning of the word. Synonyms. Antonyms. Homonyms. Phraseological phrases. Success: MO 71.55%
30 Odintsovo district 67.66% Task 23. Means of communication of sentences in the text. Achieved: Moscow Region 61.72% Odintsovo District 63.20% Assignments Semantic and speech analysis of the text.
31 Task 24. Speech. Analysis of means of expression. The ability to exercise language self-control, evaluate written statements from the point of view of linguistic design. Successful: Moscow Region 95.52% Odintsovo District 81.25%
32 Diagram1. Completing multiple-choice tasks (part 1)
34 9 6 79% % % Completing tasks with a detailed answer (part 2) Criteria for the task Maximum score MO Odintsovo district
35 1. Formulation of the problem 1 point 96.74% 94.85% 2. Commentary on the formulated problem 3. Reflection of the author’s position 4. Argumentation of one’s own opinion 5. Semantic value, verbal coherence and consistency of presentation 2 points 56.18% 62.14 % 1 point 92.15% 90.68% 3 points 44.15% 51.32% 2 points 56.78% 61.16%
36 Completing tasks with a detailed answer (part 2) Criteria for the task Maximum score MO Odintsovo district
37 6. Accuracy and expressiveness of speech 7. Compliance with spelling norms 8. Compliance with punctuation norms 9. Compliance with language norms 10. Compliance with speech norms 11. Compliance with ethical standards 12. Compliance with factual accuracy in background material 2 points 31.27% 43.3% 3 points 34.94% 44.43% 3 points 19.74% 30.20% 2 points 35.12% 44.96% 2 points 33.23% 42.54% 1 point 98.76% 97.78% 1 point 89.43% 87.35%
38 Diagram 2. Completing tasks with a detailed answer (part 2)
39 SUMMARY STATISTICS ON THE NUMBER OF USE PARTICIPANTS BY SUBJECTS
40 EARLY AND MAIN STAGES LITERATURE Moscow region 2097 people. Odintsovo district 104 people. (total) Odintsovo district 90 people (current year graduates) Average score for the Moscow region 59.93 Average score for the Odintsovo district 59.48 1 person (current year graduate) did not pass the threshold score Peculiarities of changes in control tests measuring materials Unified State Exam in Literature
41 1. There are 2 parts of the examination paper. 2. Continuous numbering of tasks has been adopted, without letter designations B, C. 3. Testing and measuring materials consist of 17 tasks, differing in form and level of complexity. Part 1 Part 1 analysis of literary works. The ability to determine the main elements of the content and artistic structure of works (themes, issues, characters and events, artistic techniques etc.)
42 First set of tasks Second set of tasks Set 1 refers to a fragment of an epic, lyric epic, dramatic work: - 7 tasks with a short answer (1-7); - 2 tasks with a detailed answer in the amount of 5-10 sentences (8.9). 2 set of tasks relates to a lyrical work: - 5 tasks with a short answer (10-14); - 2 tasks with a detailed answer in the amount of 5-10 sentences (15.16).
43 Part 2 Part 2 - writing a full-length extended essay in literary theme. The graduate is offered 3 questions (), covering the most important stages of the national historical and literary process: on the works ancient Russian literature, classics of the 18th century and the first half of the 19th century; based on works of the second half of the 19th century; based on works of the 20th century.
44 Part 2 - advanced level task. The graduate selects only one of the questions and answers it in the form of an essay. Tasks 1-7 test students’ knowledge in the field of theory and history of literature, knowledge of the content of the work from which the fragment was taken for analysis. Tested skills MO Odintsovo district 1. Determination of the content elements of the text related to the place 77.33% 72.09% 78.8% 2. of this fragment in the structure of the work, the chronology of the episode, its correlation of the work with the system of images 86.59% 74.41% 85.5% 3. 77.46% 67.44% 80%
45 4. Determination of types and functions 55.18% 44.18% 48.8% 5. author's expressive 84.29% 72.09% 86.66% 6. means, elements of artistic form. 93.05% 79.06% 91% 7. 88.41% 80.23% 93%
46 The tasks relate to the analysis of a lyrical work. These assignments test students' knowledge of the field literary trends and currents, Tested skills MO Odintsovo district 10. Identification of the features of the author’s poetics, types and functions of author’s expressive means, elements of artistic form. 89.96% 73.25% 94.44% % 69.76% 85.5% .47% 76.74% 81.1% .71% 56.97% 58.88% .72% 61.62% 67% poetry, visual and expressive means.
47 The results of completing tasks with expanded Tasks 8,15 are associated with the meaningful answer (8,9,15,16) aspect of the work Task Criterion Max. score MO Max. point area 8. The question about the role and place of the fragment of an epic, dramatic lyric epic work proposed for analysis, its themes and issues. or Depth of judgments made and persuasiveness of arguments 3 points 29.54% 26.6%
48 15. Analysis of the ideological and thematic content of the poem, its plot and images, the emotional impact of the poetic text on the reader. 3 points 30.29% 27.7%
49 Results of completing tasks with a detailed answer (8,9,15,16) Tasks 9,16 require the inclusion of the analyzed material in a literary context Assignment Max.score MO Max.score Odintsovo district 9. Detailed reasoning about the problematic and thematic connections of this epic , dramatic, lyrical 4 points 12.97% 4 points 18.8%
50 16. works with works of others domestic writers and poets 9.94% 15.55% Results of tasks with a detailed answer Criterion Max. score MO Odintsovo district 1. Depth of disclosure of the topic of the essay and persuasiveness of judgments 3 points 16.08% 17.7%
51 2. Level of proficiency in theoretical and literary concepts 2 points 35.07% 32.2% 3. Validity of using the text of the work 3 points 20.57% 20% 4. Compositional integrity and consistency of presentation 3 points 25.58% 25.55% 5. Following speech norms 3 points 16.51% 11.11%
Moscow 2017-2018 academic year Examination dictionary GIA state final certification, an exam that involves a certain procedure. Unified State Examination, state form
In pursuance of the Order of the Education Department of the Administration of the Municipal Municipality "Syktyvkar" dated August 22, 213 396, the citywide action plan for preparing 11th grade students for the Unified State Exam in compulsory subjects in 213-214
Analysis of the trial Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2016. 8 students took part in the examination. testing in the Russian language, the average primary score in the subject at school was 29 points. Highest score
Work program paid educational service “Tutoring. Preparation for the Unified State Exam in the Russian language" 2015-2016 academic year Teacher Shapovalova G.V. Purpose of the course: - expanding the linguistic horizons of students
Subject-content analysis of the results of the unified state exam in the Russian language in 2016 1. General characteristics of control measuring materials in the Russian language in 2016. Target
Explanatory note Entrance tests in the Russian language when admitting applicants to the Samara Faculty of the State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Moscow City
Codifier of content elements, Russian language, grades 10-11 Section 1. List of content elements checked when completing the final test work in Russian language in grades 10-11, compiled
Analysis of the results of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language of graduates of general education institutions of the Western educational district 1. The quantitative composition of the Unified State Examination participants in the Russian language in the unified state
Tasks Medium< мин 24-60 61-80 81-100 Анализ ЕГЭ- 2017 по русскому языку Учитель Литвинова В.А. Характеристика участников ЕГЭ по русскому языку Сведения об участниках и основных результатах ЕГЭ по русскому
PROJECT Unified state exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE The specification of control measuring materials for conducting the unified state exam in the Russian language in 2019 was prepared by the Federal
FEDERAL STATE BUDGETARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION “ORYOL STATE UNIVERSITY NAMED AFTER I.S. TURGENEV" ENTRANCE TEST PROGRAM in the Russian language 28
Unified state exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Specification of control measuring materials for conducting the unified state exam in the Russian language in 2018 1. Purpose of the Unified State Exam KIM Unified
Specification of control measuring materials for conducting the unified state exam 2016 in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE 1. Purpose of the Unified State Exam KIM Control measuring materials allow you to establish
Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Project Specification of control measuring materials for the 2012 Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Specification of control materials
St. Petersburg state university PROGRAM OF ENTRANCE TESTS RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Section I. Main questions and topics. At the Russian language exam, the applicant must demonstrate fluent
Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Specification of control measuring materials for the 2010 Unified State Exam in the Russian language was prepared by the Federal State
Specification of control measuring materials for the 2014 Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE 2 Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE 1. Purpose of KIM Unified State Exam Control
Brief overview of the main changes in the State Academic Examination 2019 in Russian language and literature Source: demo versions of the KIM in Russian language and literature (fipi.ru) Bakulin M.A., 2018 Main changes in the State Academic Assessment in the Russian language
PROJECT Unified state exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE The specification of control measuring materials for conducting the unified state exam in the Russian language in 2020 was prepared by the Federal
Project SPECIFICATION of control measuring materials for the 2010 unified state exam in the Russian language 1. Purpose of the examination work Control measuring materials allow you to establish
RUSSIAN LANGUAGE 1. Characteristics of test and measurement materials in the Russian language The work on the Russian language includes 30 tasks with a choice of answers from 4 proposed ones, 8 open-type tasks requiring
Specification of control measuring materials for the 2011 Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Specification of control materials
Monitoring report 2 2016 1. General results of the class: 11 A 1.1. General characteristics work performed Name of work Monitoring work 2 Dates 09/07/2016-09/21/2016
Analysis of OGE-8 in the Russian language Teacher Melnikova V.A. 5 academic performance 78.8 Quality OGE results - 8 in the Russian language 4 Avg. school score 3.9 Avg. district score 4 Avg. RSO score - A B state
Project Specification of control measuring materials for the 2011 unified state exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE 1. Purpose of the examination work Control measuring materials
Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE DRAFT Specification of control measuring materials for the 2015 Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE 2 Specification of control materials
Specification of control measuring materials for the 2012 Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE 2 Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Specification of control materials
Specification of control measuring materials for the 2013 Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE 2 Unified State Exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Specification of control materials
State final certification of graduates of general education organizations as a mechanism for independent and objective assessment of results educational activities institutions, educational activities
Specification of control measuring materials for carrying out diagnostic thematic work in preparation for the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE (high school) 1. The purpose of the CMM to assess the level of general education
Department of Education of the City of Moscow Samara Fal of the State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education of the City of Moscow "Moscow City pedagogical university» Department
Explanatory note. Course program " Traps of the Unified State Exam in the Russian language" is a system of classes aimed at in-depth study of difficult cases of spelling and punctuation, which will allow students
Analysis of the results of the state final certification of graduates of IX grades in the Russian language In the 2013-2014 academic year in the state final certification in educational programs basic general
Codifier of content elements and requirements for the level of training of graduates of general education institutions for conducting diagnostic tests in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE Codifier of content elements
State (final) certification of 2010 (in a new form) in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE of students who have mastered the basic general education programs Specification of examination work to be carried out in 2010
Analytical report on the results of a six-month test in the Russian language for 11th grade students of the Akbulak district educational institution In pursuance of the orders of the Ministry of Education of the Orenburg region
Report on monitoring work at school, Republic of Crimea 2016 Contents of the report Title Page 1. General results of the work 3. General characteristics of the work carried out 3 2. Comparison of the general results
Unified state exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE The specification of control measuring materials for conducting the unified state exam in the Russian language in 2016 was prepared by the Federal
Work program for individual and group classes in the Russian language for students in class for the 208-209 academic year Section I. Explanatory note. Work program for individual and group classes “Preparation
0 BSPU 1 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FSBEI HE "BSPU") QMS DP 4.2.3. 02 Documentation management "" anlksh^yavvm ^YASHYYAg^^^^YAYAL kg 3 QMS STO 7.3.-2.4.14-2016 Entrance program
2 Specification of control measuring materials for the state (final) certification in 2012 (in a new form) in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE of students who have mastered basic general education
Specification of control measuring materials for conducting the main state exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE in 2015 2 State final certification for educational programs of the main
Subject: Russian language, 11th grade 2017 CONTENTS 1. List of diagnostic work 2. Quantitative indicators 3. General results 3.1. Results at the regional level 3.2. Distribution by points
ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF COMPLETING INDIVIDUAL TASKS AND GROUPS OF TASKS FOR THE 06 YEAR Unified State Exam IN THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE IN THE NOVGOROD REGION Assignment number Part Checked content element Information processing of written documents
State (final) certification of 2011 (in a new form) in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE of students who have mastered basic general education programs Project Specification of control measuring materials
1 1. Explanatory note The work program of the course “Russian language with excellent marks” for grade 9 was developed on the basis of the federal state standard general education(Sample programs of the main
Ak-Dovurak city Report on monitoring work I will pass the Unified State Exam, stage 1 in 11th grade Russian. 2017 Report on diagnostic work: "Russian language, grade 11, winter 2017" CONTENTS 1. Regulations 1.1.
The program is compiled on the basis of the mandatory minimum content of secondary (complete) and basic general education (appendices to Orders of the Ministry of Education of Russia 1236 of 05/19/98 and 56 of 06/30/99). Instrumentation
Specification of intermediate certification in the Russian language for 7th grade students 1. Purpose of intermediate certification Interim certification is carried out to determine the level of mastery by students
Municipal government educational institution "Sulevkent secondary school" Report on monitoring work Y_SDAM_USE_III_STAGE in the Russian language class 2017 Report on diagnostic
1. EXPLANATORY NOTE The program is formed on the basis of the federal state educational standard of secondary general education, the federal state educational standard
The municipal budgetary educational institution Shchelkovo gymnasium of the Shchelkovo municipal district of the Moscow region was APPROVED by order of the director 432/OD MBOU Shchelkovo gymnasium MO dated 29.08
Explanatory note In a modern school, when priorities are given to developmental education, the main means of development have become training in transformative and evaluative activities. Transformative activity
Specification of work for the regional exam in the Russian language in grade 7 1. Purpose of the test work Purpose of the examination work to identify and evaluate the degree of compliance of students’ preparation
CONTROL AND MEASUREMENT MATERIALS AND EXAM PROCEDURE Examination in the discipline “Russian language and literature. Russian language" is carried out in writing at the expense of the time allocated by the Federal State Educational Standard for secondary vocational education for intermediate
Work program for individual and group classes in the Russian language for students in class for the 206-207 academic year Section I. Explanatory note. Work program for individual and group classes “Preparation
State final certification in the Russian language in 2017 GIA forms (state final certification) 11th grade Unified State Exam (unified state exam) GVE (state final exam) 2017
I. Explanatory note 1. Abstract. The entrance test program in the Russian language is intended to prepare applicants entering a non-state educational institution of higher education
Todzhinsky municipal district Report on monitoring work I will pass the Unified State Exam, stage 1 in 11th grade Russian. 2017 CONTENTS 1. Regulations 1.1. Description of work 1.2. Dates 2. General results
PROJECT Unified state exam in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE The specification of control measuring materials for conducting the unified state exam in the Russian language in 2017 was prepared by the Federal